Home > Blog > Behavior Is Communication: What It Means for Leaders at Work

The idea that behavior is communication is widely used in education, where teachers apply it to understand students. It applies to adults at work too.

Stress can show up in how people act before it shows up in what they say. Even strong, well-led teams can see it during busy or uncertain periods. For leaders, the principle offers a steadier starting point for responding to challenging behavior.

What Does “Behavior Is Communication” Mean?

Behavior is communication means that actions, especially challenging ones, can signal an emotion, need, or stress that a person isn’t putting into words. The person may not have the words yet, or may not feel comfortable saying them out loud. While some behavior is direct, such as asking for help, much of it is subtle, nonverbal, and misunderstood.

The idea has roots in communication theory. In the journal Kybernetes, Wolfram Lutterer traces it to Watzlawick’s first axiom, which holds that “one cannot not communicate” (Watzlawick et al., 1967). Read this way, even silence can send a message to the people around us.

Crying, withdrawing, lashing out, or even a clenched fist can all be signals. At work, those signals may look like short replies in chat, missed meetings, or a raised voice in a tense review. Seeing behavior as communication invites leaders to look beneath the surface and beyond positions and reactions to the needs that may be driving them.

Not Every Action Carries a Message

Not every action is meant to send a message. One useful way to think about this is to sort behavior into non-informative, informative, and communicative types.

Non-informative behavior tells others little, like shifting in an uncomfortable chair. Informative behavior reveals something about a person’s state without any intent to share it, like a yawn late in the afternoon. Communicative behavior is purposeful, such as a colleague sighing during a meeting to show frustration with a plan.

This distinction is a caution against over-reading. Our job isn’t to decode challenging behavior like a secret language.

A behavior that stands out can prompt a respectful question. The person’s answer is likely to be more accurate than a guess about their attitude or intent.

Why Behavior Speaks Louder Under Stress

Behavior may speak louder when people are under stress. When needs such as safety, belonging, or self-worth feel threatened, a person may react before they can explain what’s wrong. These needs belong to a needs-based framework of six core psychological needs that may shape how people respond to conflict.

People carry past experiences into their reactions. A colleague who once reported to a manager whose feedback felt harsh may hear routine feedback as a warning. They may respond with fear, anger, or withdrawal, even when the situation doesn’t seem threatening to others.

Workplace stress is also common, according to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2026 report. In self-reported survey data, Gallup’s daily stress data shows 50% of U.S. employees experienced stress a lot of the previous day. With that much pressure, the idea that behavior is communication may help leaders consider whether sudden changes in conduct are requests for support.

What Workplace Behavior May Be Communicating

Workplace behavior may be communicating a need that a person hasn’t voiced. The IRIS Center at Vanderbilt University describes four functions of behavior in K-12 students. The module notes that whether students act out or withdraw, “they are engaging in these behaviors for a reason.”

Those functions are attention, items or activities, escape, and automatic. Automatic behavior is driven by internal sensations, such as relief from discomfort or anxiety, and IRIS notes it’s rare.

Because the research comes from K-12 settings, the functions offer adults a loose analogy for the idea that behavior is communication. They aren’t a tool for diagnosing anyone. Seen through that lens, these workplace examples show how each function might appear.

• An employee who keeps avoiding a meeting where they feel unprepared may be seeking escape from that pressure.
• A colleague who interrupts or escalates in discussions may be seeking attention or connection and a chance to be heard.
• Team members who argue over resources or schedules may be seeking access to what they need to do their work.
• Someone who steps away from a loud, crowded workspace may be seeking escape from sensory overload.

Quiet behaviors count too. Silence in meetings, slower responses, or a drop in collaboration can be quiet signs of hidden conflict. Paying attention to these communication behaviors gives leaders a chance to check in before tension grows.

How to Respond When Behavior Is Communicating Something

Putting the idea that behavior is communication into practice starts with your own state. Rather than reacting to surface-level challenging behavior, we should focus on regulating our own nervous system first. Building emotional intelligence in conflict can help you notice your reactions and pause before you respond.

When someone crosses their arms or avoids eye contact, you can easily assume they’re closed off or disrespectful. However, that might not be true. They could be cold, anxious, or overwhelmed.

Instead of interpreting, we recommend asking or observing over time. Learning how to interpret nonverbal cues can help you hold several possibilities in mind. A simple check-in such as “I noticed you’ve been quieter in meetings. How are things going?” invites the person to share without feeling accused.

How something is said often matters more than what is said. A calm tone and open posture can shift the energy of an interaction before it escalates.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) writes its de-escalation guidance for potentially dangerous situations. In it, CISA recommends calm nonverbals, advising tone, expressions, body language, and gestures that “relay calm and empathy.”

Behavior can also build in stages. Understanding the escalation cycle can help you recognize when frustration is turning into a more intense reaction, so you can slow the conversation down early. A transformative, interest-based lens keeps your attention on the needs and interests beneath those reactions.

Clear, consistent standards still apply. You can acknowledge someone’s stress and still talk about what happens when expectations aren’t met. If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures, since de-escalation supports safety but doesn’t replace safety protocols.

Instead of rushing to correct challenging behavior, ask yourself: What might this person be trying to say? The answer may point to workload, uncertainty, or a strained working relationship that you can work through together.

Frequently Asked Questions

Building These Skills Across Your Team

Reading signals and responding calmly are skills leaders can practice over time. Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers de-escalation training for leaders that helps managers and supervisors practice reading what behavior may be communicating and responding calmly. To explore options for your organization, Schedule a Free Consultation with PPS.

Home > Blog > Real Estate Communication: Verbal Communication Strategies for Agents and Teams

Buying or selling a home brings legal terms, deadlines, and large sums of money together, often for people under significant stress. Even experienced agents can find a routine conversation turning tense. That tension is a normal part of the work, and thoughtful real estate communication can give agents a steadier way to respond.

This article covers what effective communication looks like, the verbal and nonverbal strategies that support it, and how teams can set expectations when deals stall.

What Is Effective Real Estate Communication?

Effective real estate communication helps clients, other agents, lenders, and vendors understand what’s happening in a transaction and feel respected. Effective communication strategies in real estate involve listening, observing, clarifying, and adapting. It covers your words, your tone of voice, and your body language.

These skills carry weight because so many people rely on an agent. The National Association of REALTORS® reports in NAR’s 2025 Profile that 88% of all home buyers used an agent or broker.

Communication is a human skill grounded in the psychology of conflict. People who feel heard and informed may find it easier to think clearly and weigh options when a deal gets complicated.

Why Communication Shapes Every Transaction

Clear real estate communication can lower the uncertainty that often sits behind tension. The buying or selling process in real estate is often characterized by legal terms, confusing timelines, and financial stress. Clients can easily feel lost.

When you clearly explain contracts, fees, and market trends, you help clients make informed choices that feel right for them. NAR’s summary of what buyers want from agents says buyers want an agent who helps them “negotiate, explain, and understand the real estate market.” A quick check might sound like, “Which part of the inspection contingency should we go over again?”

In real estate, reputation can travel quickly through referrals. Every message, every update, and even every pause in communication becomes part of how you’re remembered. NAR’s 2025 Profile also found that 91% of buyers would use their agent again or recommend them to others.

Professionalism still matters when a deal falls through. A buyer who loses a bidding war may return later or mention you to a friend if the last conversation left the door open.

Verbal Communication Strategies in Real Estate

Spoken delivery carries extra weight during negotiations. In real estate, you deal with high-stakes emotions, including frustration, anxiety, and excitement. These verbal communication strategies can help agents keep those conversations calm and productive.

Practice Active Listening

Active listening is often where a calmer conversation starts. It can look like steady eye contact, a brief pause before replying, and reflecting back what you hear. A simple reflection might sound like, “So the inspection timeline is what’s worrying you most?”

When clients feel listened to, the relationship may benefit. Kluger and colleagues’ meta-analysis of perceived listening pooled 664 effect sizes in the Journal of Business and Psychology. It found perceived listening strongly associated with relationship quality (r = .51), though the studies were largely correlational and workplace-based.

For more ways to build this habit, explore these active listening techniques.

Tune Into Paraverbal Communication

Paraverbal communication covers the volume, pacing, and tone that shape how your words land. Sometimes, what causes tension is how something is said. A rushed tone, raised voice, or clipped answer can create friction.

On phone calls, where clients can’t see your face, give extra attention to your tone. Adjusting your volume, pacing, and vocal tone helps you deliver even difficult messages in a calm, respectful way, especially when emotions are running high. Slowing down before sharing news like a low appraisal can give the listener a moment to absorb it.

Be Clear and Respectful

Directness doesn’t mean harshness. Agents can be firm about facts, deadlines, and limits while staying warm toward the person hearing them. Specific, solution-focused pushback can help a hard message feel less personal.

A counteroffer the client won’t like is a good test. You might say, “I know this is lower than you hoped, but the buyer moved on two terms, so let’s walk through a response.”

Reading Body Language and Nonverbal Cues

Body language can steady a conversation or add to its tension. Crossed arms, avoiding eye contact, or shifting impatiently are nonverbal communication cues that may come across as dismissive, even when that isn’t your intent. An open posture and relaxed hands can signal attention.

A furrowed brow, a shift in tone, or silence after a proposal may suggest hesitation the other person hasn’t voiced yet. Treat a cue as a prompt to ask, since assumptions about what someone feels can miss the mark. A gentle check-in can bring it into the open: “You got quiet when I mentioned the repair credit, so what’s on your mind?”

What Sits Beneath Tense Negotiations

Negotiations often come with friction. For instance, someone may be over budget, under pressure, or just having a bad day. Beneath a firm position, such as refusing to move a closing date, there may be a need for safety, belonging, or independence.

A model of six core psychological needs offers one way to look beyond positions and reactions. The Pennsylvania Association of REALTORS® notes that many difficulties result from misunderstandings or miscommunications. Asking about interests can bring those needs to the surface: “What matters most to you about the closing date?”

Staying calm yourself can give the other person a steadier point of reference. Slowing your pace, lowering your voice, and acknowledging concerns are core de-escalation skills at work. If there’s an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures; de-escalation supports safety but doesn’t replace safety protocols.

Setting Expectations and Responding When Deals Stall

Expectations set early can make later setbacks easier to talk through. Ask each client whether they’d prefer daily calls or weekly texts, what worries them, and what they expect. A question like “What would help you feel most informed?” can open that conversation.

When you’re upfront about timelines, possible delays, and what’s realistic, it can help you avoid misunderstandings. Financing deadlines are a common example. For most mortgage loans, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s three-business-day rule requires that borrowers receive the Closing Disclosure at least three business days before closing.

That duty belongs to the lender, but agents can explain it early and note that certain late loan changes can restart the clock. You might say, “If the loan terms change late, the waiting period may restart, so let’s plan a buffer.”

When a deal stalls, a calm, honest update can ease uncertainty. Share what you know, what you don’t know yet, and when you’ll follow up. The same courtesy extends to other agents, lenders, and contractors, whose cooperation can shape whether a delayed closing stays on track.

Building Communication Skills Across Your Team

Brokerage and property management leaders can strengthen real estate communication by practicing these skills together through role-plays and call reviews. Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers communication skills training and de-escalation training grounded in a transformative, interest-based approach. Schedule a Free Consultation to talk through your team’s goals.

Home > Blog > Non-Verbal De-Escalation Techniques: Examples for Calmer Conversations at Work

Tense moments happen in every workplace. They show up at front desks, in clinics, and in team meetings, and they’re a normal part of working with people who care about outcomes. Much of what calms or inflames those moments is communicated before anyone chooses their words.

This guide covers non-verbal de-escalation techniques that managers, HR leaders, and frontline employees can use when someone is upset. It explains why body language carries extra weight under stress and how to use your stance, hands, eyes, space, and voice. It also covers early escalation cues, pairing signals with words, and practicing as a team.

What Is Non-Verbal De-Escalation?

Non-verbal de-escalation is using body language, positioning, expression, gestures, tone, and silence to lower the sense of threat in a tense interaction. Core examples include an open, angled stance, visible open hands, soft eye contact, respectful distance, slow movements, and a low, steady voice. Government and clinical guidance recommends these signals because they can help lower the sense of threat.

Nonverbal communication (NVC) is everything we express without speaking. It includes body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, gestures, and even silence. In de-escalation, those channels tell the other person whether they’re safe with you.

People decide quickly whether they feel threatened, and that judgment usually happens before a word is spoken. When your body signals calm, the person may have more room to express the needs and emotions beneath the surface, like feeling unheard or afraid. For a broader foundation, start with the types of nonverbal communication that shape everyday interactions at work.

Why Body Language Matters More When Emotions Run High

Stress can change how people take in information. When emotions run high, people can stop listening logically. They respond instead to tone, posture, and expression.

In the thick of a conflict, communication can break down. Stress, fear, or language gaps can make verbal problem-solving difficult. In those moments, non-verbal de-escalation, such as a steady posture and calm voice, may reach someone before your words do.

A popular statistic claims that nearly all communication is nonverbal, but it shouldn’t be read as a rule. Communication scholar David Lapakko’s 2007 article, an analysis of the 93% myth, traces the figure to Albert Mehrabian’s small 1967 studies.

Lapakko notes that Mehrabian himself said those findings dealt only with communications of feelings and attitudes. Body language carries real weight in tense moments, and it works alongside words.

According to BLS workplace violence data, health care and social assistance had the highest workplace violence counts and rates of any private industry in 2021–2022. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports the sector accounted for 72.8% of nonfatal private-industry cases requiring days away from work, job restriction, or transfer.

If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures; de-escalation supports safety but never replaces safety protocols. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) similarly advises people to remove themselves from the situation and seek safety when violence is imminent.

Non-Verbal De-Escalation Techniques and Examples

Federal and clinical guidance from CISA, NIOSH, and Project BETA converges on the same non-verbal de-escalation techniques, adapted below for workplace conversations.

Position Your Body at an Angle

Where you stand can shape how safe someone feels. The NIOSH non-verbal skills guidance for nurses advises, “Approach the patient from an angle or from the side.” CISA’s guidance describes a similar “relaxed and alert stance off to the side of the person.”

Keep your knees soft and your weight balanced so you can stay relaxed and ready to move. Avoid a chin-up, chest-forward pose that can unintentionally escalate a moment. Don’t block a doorway, since a person who feels trapped may become more upset.

Keep Your Hands Visible and Movements Slow

Hands are one of the first things an upset person may watch. The CISA de-escalation guide recommends “keeping your hands down, open, and visible at all times” and “using slow, deliberate movements.” Relaxed hands at your sides can signal that you mean no harm.

Pointing or fidgeting, on the other hand, can escalate a fragile situation fast. NIOSH lists finger pointing and crossed arms among the gestures to avoid, and CISA suggests replacing pacing with steadier movement.

Use Soft Eye Contact and a Calm Expression

Eye contact works best when it’s steady and natural. Too much eye contact can feel aggressive. Too little can seem evasive.

Aim for a soft gaze that occasionally breaks away and a calm expression that fits the moment. A tight jaw or raised brow might seem small, but in tense situations, people notice. Guidance differs on smiling, since NIOSH lists a smile among supportive signals while CISA cautions against faking one.

Give People Room

Physical distance can lower perceived threat and give someone a sense of control. The Project BETA consensus statement, a 2012 consensus from the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry, advises “at least 2 arm’s lengths of distance.” That guidance was written for agitated patients in emergency settings.

Comfort with distance may vary by person and setting, so watch how someone responds and adjust. Avoid touching the person, which NIOSH notes may be misinterpreted, even when your intent is to comfort.

Lower Your Voice and Allow Silence

Your voice sends non-verbal signals through tone, pace, and volume. Sometimes the way words are said throws someone off more than the words themselves. Sharp inflection, rushed pace, or rising volume can add stress even when the message is neutral.

Slow down, lower your volume slightly, and resist matching a raised voice. CISA notes that a slower rate of speech can be more soothing. Pauses give the person time to think and finish their thought, and a simple phrase like “Take your time” can show you’re willing to listen.

How to Read Early Non-Verbal Escalation Cues

Escalation can show in the body before it shows in words. You might notice someone shifting their weight, glancing at the exit, and tightening their jaw. These subtle signs, if caught early, can help prevent a full escalation.

Other early cues can include clenched fists, pacing, changes in eye contact, or a chest-out stance. Treat them as signals of rising emotion rather than labels for the person. Beneath the surface, they may point to unmet needs, such as feeling unheard, disrespected, or unsure what happens next.

Responding to the need with space, a calmer pace, or a simple “I can see this has been frustrating” can help someone feel acknowledged. Understanding the stages of the escalation cycle can help you match your response to where someone is.

Your own signals matter too. Tense shoulders, locked knees, or darting eyes can push someone further into frustration or fear. Before you respond, take a slow breath, relax your shoulders, and check your stance, because regulating yourself first can make calm signals easier to send.

How Non-Verbal and Verbal De-Escalation Work Together

Non-verbal de-escalation works best when your words and body language match. What you say may be right, but if your body language contradicts your words, it won’t matter. Mismatched cues send mixed signals that confuse or even escalate the person you’re trying to help.

Someone saying “I understand” while frowning, crossing their arms, and glancing away doesn’t feel understanding at all. Project BETA’s consensus names congruence between a clinician’s words and body language as most important.

Nonverbal and verbal tools work together. When someone says, “I’m here to help,” but their posture is closed off, their words lose power. The verbal message gives structure, but the nonverbal cues provide emotional tone.

Tone can also pull against content. Someone can speak calmly while using invalidating phrases (“You’re overreacting”) or speak assertively while staying compassionate (“That makes sense, let’s figure it out”).

Try pairing a phrase like “You seem upset. Let’s slow down” with a small step back and a lower voice. Other phrases that pair well with calm body language include “I want to understand what happened” and “Let’s figure out the next step together.” The guide to core de-escalation skills at work covers listening, validation, and other verbal skills in more detail.

How Teams Can Practice Non-Verbal Skills

Teams build non-verbal de-escalation skills through practice. Hands-down stance, soft knees, and calm breath are habits built through repetition. Practicing them in a calm moment can make them easier to reach for under stress.

Short, low-pressure drills can fit into team meetings or onboarding:

• Run brief role-plays where one person plays an upset customer, patient, or colleague and the other practices an angled stance and open hands.
• Practice a hands-down stance with soft knees and a slow breath until it feels natural.
• Try voice drills that slow your pace and lower your volume while repeating phrases like “Take your time.”

Rotating roles lets each person notice how these signals feel from the other side. An emergency department training study in Academic Psychiatry (2024) found more than 90% of surveyed staff at a single US emergency department reported improved confidence. In that Academic Psychiatry study, confidence held at six months, though results were self-reported and the course focused on verbal skills.

Care teams supporting people in distress can pair these drills with mental health de-escalation techniques. On phone and video calls, tone and pacing can carry more of the message because posture and distance are harder to read. In those settings, overcompensate for lost nonverbal cues with stronger intention and slower delivery.

Frequently Asked Questions

Building Non-Verbal De-Escalation Skills Across Your Organization

At Pollack Peacebuilding Systems, our de-escalation training for teams gives employees, managers, and leaders a structured space to practice these non-verbal skills alongside verbal ones. The training can help people recognize the needs and emotions beneath the surface and respond with calm, consistent signals. Schedule a Free Consultation to talk through your team’s goals.

Home > Blog > Healthcare Call Center Best Practices: How to Keep Patient Calls Calm, Clear, and Caring

What Healthcare Call Center Best Practices Look Like

Healthcare call center best practices are the communication, privacy, and training habits that help agents support patients well by phone. They help agents understand why a patient is calling, respond with empathy, and give clear next steps. They also cover protecting health information and staying steady when a call turns tense.

Patients often call while worried, in pain, or confused about a bill. A healthcare contact center is often where that stress first meets the organization, so even strong teams can find these calls demanding. Communicating clearly under pressure is a conflict skill, and agents can learn and practice it like any other skill.

The practices below cover listening for what a patient needs, structuring calls clearly, and leading with empathy. They also address de-escalating tense conversations, protecting privacy, and measuring what matters. Each one supports the patient experience while giving agents practical approaches for calls that feel difficult.

Listen for What the Patient Needs

Active listening means understanding a patient’s concern and acknowledging the emotion behind it before moving to a solution. Active listening enables agents to identify the root cause of a patient’s frustration, whether it is a delayed appointment or a billing error. When agents act on the first thing they hear, they can miss what the caller needs.

What a patient asks for and what they need may differ. A caller pressing hard for an earlier appointment may be worried about a diagnosis beneath the surface. Agents who listen for those interests and emotions, beyond positions and reactions, can respond to the concern that’s driving the call.

Verbal cues help callers know they’ve been heard. Short acknowledgments such as “I understand” or “Let me make sure I have this right” signal attention without interrupting. Paraphrasing the concern back gives the patient a chance to correct anything the agent missed.

A simple pattern can carry many calls: acknowledge the concern, explain what’s possible, and offer a step the patient can act on. For example, if a patient is frustrated about conflicting appointment schedules, the agent should first acknowledge the inconvenience and then check for the earliest available slot. Leaders who want more examples can explore our guide to handling difficult customers.

Communicate Clearly and Structure Every Call

Clear communication can keep small misunderstandings from growing into conflict. Among healthcare call center best practices, plain language and a confirmed next step give patients something concrete to hold onto.

For example, agents should use straightforward language when explaining appointment procedures or medication instructions. Avoiding jargon and ensuring that patients fully understand the next steps can reduce anxiety and demonstrate professionalism. This approach is particularly important when addressing complex inquiries such as insurance claims or medical test results.

Communication gaps can carry real weight in healthcare. The CRICO malpractice communication report shares CRICO’s analysis of national medical malpractice claims, which found that 30% of claims involved a communication failure. These claims covered clinical care broadly rather than call centers.

A consistent call structure gives agents a steady path, even when a caller is upset. One simple structure has three parts: greet the patient warmly, identify the issue, and share a clear plan for what happens next. A call center script built on this shape can still leave agents room to adapt the wording to each caller.

For instance, agents might say, “Thank you for calling. Let me confirm your details to better assist you. What issue are you experiencing today?”

Automated phone menus, or interactive voice response (IVR) systems, can handle routine requests when patients can still reach a person. For example, while an IVR handles initial inquiries, more complex issues should be routed to a live agent who can offer a personal touch. Clear routing options can spare patients from repeating themselves to a menu that can’t help.

Lead With Empathy and a Calm Tone

Empathy can shape how a patient experiences the entire call. A systematic review of physician empathy in the British Journal of General Practice examined seven studies in general practice. It found physician empathy was associated with patient satisfaction and lower patient anxiety and distress.

That’s clinical evidence about doctors, and call center leaders can still draw on its core idea. Patients may respond to feeling understood, whether they’re in an exam room or on the phone.

The tone of voice sets the stage for the entire conversation. A calm, measured tone conveys confidence and professionalism, which is particularly important when dealing with patient concerns. Agents can keep their pace unhurried and their volume even, especially when a caller’s voice rises.

Personal details can help patients feel recognized. Using the patient’s name, referencing a recent visit, and pulling up records quickly means patients don’t have to repeat their story. Quick record access also gives agents the context to respond to the concern instead of starting from scratch.

Empathy phrases tend to land when they’re sincere and specific. For instance, acknowledging a patient’s frustration by saying, “I understand how this situation could be frustrating, and I am here to help,” can foster trust and facilitate a more productive conversation. Agents can build this skill over time, and our article on emotional intelligence in de-escalation explores how.

Prepare Agents to De-escalate Tense Calls

Frustration and fear can surface on any patient call. A patient facing a denied claim, a long wait, or an uncertain diagnosis may direct that stress at the agent. Treating these moments as a normal part of healthcare conversations can help agents stay steady instead of taking them personally.

Agents can use several practical call center de-escalation techniques to slow a tense call down:

• Let the caller finish speaking before responding, even when the answer seems obvious.
• Name the emotion you hear, such as “It sounds like this delay has been really stressful.”
• Paraphrase the concern so the caller knows it was understood.
• Wait to offer solutions until the caller seems ready to hear them.
• Set respectful limits if language becomes abusive, and explain what will happen next.

These steps help agents respond to the emotion first, which can make the practical conversation that follows easier.

The evidence on de-escalation training is still limited. A de-escalation training systematic review in BMC Psychiatry looked at five low-quality studies in forensic psychiatric settings. It found no relevant impact on violent incident rates, but staff seemed to feel safer after training.

Safety concerns in healthcare extend well beyond the phone. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shares 2021–2022 data in its BLS workplace violence factsheet. Healthcare and social assistance had the highest workplace violence counts and rates of any private industry, at 14.2 cases per 10,000 full-time workers.

These are injury cases across the whole sector rather than call center or verbal abuse data. They still underline the value of safety planning for patient-facing teams. If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures, because de-escalation supports safety but doesn’t replace safety protocols.

Agents build these skills through practice. Role-playing common scenarios, such as a billing question or a canceled procedure, gives agents a low-stakes way to try new responses. For instance, call recordings can be analyzed to pinpoint gaps in communication or areas where empathy could be improved.

Ongoing training keeps skills current as policies and systems change. Agents should also receive updates on HIPAA regulations, medical terminology, and emerging technologies. Our guide to customer service conflict resolution offers more ideas for building feedback into training.

Protect Patient Privacy Without Losing Warmth

Privacy steps protect patients, and agents can present them that way. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services addresses phone verification in its HHS audio-only telehealth guidance. When a caller isn’t known to the organization, staff must verify the caller’s identity orally or in writing.

HIPAA doesn’t mandate a specific verification method. Verification does need to be accessible for people with disabilities and people with limited English proficiency. Teams can plan ahead with interpreter services and alternative ways to confirm identity.

How agents explain verification can shape how it feels. A line such as “Before we go over your account, I’ll confirm a few details to protect your information” frames the step as care. For example, when accessing a patient’s records to answer a billing query, an agent must ensure that the information is shared only with the verified patient.

Measure What Matters and Support Your Agents

Customer satisfaction (CSAT) scores and first-call resolution (FCR) rates give leaders a useful view of call quality. High FCR rates reflect the ability of agents to resolve patient concerns during the first interaction, minimizing the need for follow-ups. Call analytics and sentiment tracking can add detail by showing where conversations tend to stall or grow tense.

Feedback adds context that numbers can miss. Patients’ input, gathered through post-call surveys, highlights specific concerns, while agents’ feedback identifies operational challenges. Reviewing both together can help leaders spot recurring problems, such as a confusing billing letter, that lead to repeat calls.

Handle time is worth tracking, but over-optimizing it can backfire. Pushing agents to end calls quickly may cut short the listening that tense calls need, and it can lead to more callbacks. Applying healthcare call center best practices well means giving agents enough time to understand each caller.

Agents who absorb difficult calls all day need support too. Short debriefs after hard calls, manageable caseloads, and a voice in addressing recurring issues can help agents stay steady over time. Our article on healthcare workplace conflict and turnover looks at how ongoing strain can contribute to burnout and turnover.

Build De-escalation Skills Across Your Call Center

Pollack Peacebuilding Systems (PPS) offers de-escalation training for healthcare that gives call center agents and patient access teams practical skills for tense calls. The training can help agents listen for the needs beneath the surface, respond with empathy, and stay steady under pressure. To explore what this could look like for your team, schedule a free consultation with PPS.

.

Home > Blog > Paraverbal Communication: Definition, Elements, and Workplace Examples

Every spoken message at work carries the words and the way they’re delivered. Paraverbal communication is that second layer, and everyone uses it, usually without noticing. Even skilled communicators can sound sharper or faster than they intend under pressure, which can shape how colleagues hear a request or a disagreement.

What Is Paraverbal Communication?

Paraverbal communication refers to the subtle vocal elements that accompany spoken words, such as tone, pitch, pace, and volume. Paraverbal communication focuses on how something is said rather than the literal content of the message, shaping the emotional and interpretive context of communication.

For example, a gentle tone can convey calmness or support, while a sharp tone may signal irritation or urgency. “Do you have a minute?” can sound like a friendly check-in or a sign of trouble, depending on delivery.

Verbal communication is the words you choose, and paraverbal communication (sometimes written as para verbal communication) is how your voice carries them. Facial expressions, posture, and gestures fall under nonverbal communication cues.

Vocal cues can matter most when emotions run high. Listeners may read emotion and intent from delivery before they’ve weighed the words. A colleague who hears impatience in your voice may respond to that rather than to your point.

The Core Elements of Paraverbal Communication

The four core elements of paraverbal communication are tone, pitch, volume, and pace. Pauses and emphasis work closely with pace.

Tone

Tone is the emotional quality of your voice. It reflects the emotions or attitudes behind your words, influencing how your message gets received. A manager who asks “Can we talk about the project?” warmly may signal collaboration, but delivered flatly, the question can sound like a warning.

Pitch

Pitch refers to the highness or lowness of your voice and plays a key role in expressing feelings and emphasizing certain parts of your message. A higher pitch could be perceived as enthusiastic or intense, while a lower pitch tends to sound more serious and authoritative. Pitch also shapes meaning, since a rising pitch at the end of “The report’s due Friday” can make a statement sound like a question.

Volume

Speaking too softly usually causes your words to be lost, particularly if there is a lot of background noise. On the other hand, speaking too loudly could be perceived as aggressive. It can help to match volume to the setting, speaking up on a noisy call and lowering it for a sensitive one-on-one.

Pace, Pauses, and Emphasis

A rapid pace conveys excitement or urgency but might also overwhelm your listener if you don’t use it judiciously. Conversely, speaking too slowly might bore or even frustrate your audience. As a practical observation, a short pause before an important point can give listeners time to absorb it.

Emphasis can change a sentence’s meaning without changing a single word. Consider how “I didn’t say the deadline was the problem” shifts as the stress moves:

• When you stress “I,” it suggests someone else said the deadline was the problem.
• When you stress “deadline,” it suggests the problem lies somewhere other than the deadline.
• When you stress “problem,” it suggests you see the deadline as a concern but not the main obstacle.

In a tense moment, it can help to notice which word you’re leaning on before you say it.

What the “38% Tone” Statistic Actually Says

The claim that tone makes up 38% of a message is often repeated in writing about paraverbal communication. The 7/38/55 split comes from two 1967 lab studies by psychologist Albert Mehrabian and colleagues about judging feelings and attitudes from mixed signals.

Augsburg College’s David Lapakko examines these limits in a review of Mehrabian’s research for the Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal. Lapakko notes that the main study involved 37 female psychology students and a single word, “maybe.” Lapakko also quotes Mehrabian’s own caution that “all my findings on inconsistent or redundant communications deal with communications of FEELINGS AND ATTITUDES.”

The research supports a narrower lesson about how listeners judged feelings and attitudes when words and tone sent inconsistent signals. In practice, that mismatch can be common in tense conversations, like when a teammate says “I’m fine with that” in a clipped voice.

Paraverbal Communication Examples at Work

Paraverbal communication shapes everyday conversations at work, including feedback. A gentle, lower-volume approach can make the feedback seem less confrontational and more palatable, encouraging the recipient to engage with the content constructively rather than defensively.

A steady voice can help an upset customer feel heard. Meanwhile, a tone that is too quick or loud may inadvertently increase the customer’s frustration.

In healthcare, a calm, unhurried tone can help patients feel supported. On the other hand, a rushed or sharp tone might heighten a patient’s stress and could lead to misunderstandings about their care.

Ambady and colleagues studied surgeons’ tone of voice in a paper in the journal Surgery, indexed on PubMed. In that Surgery study, surgeons rated as sounding more dominant were more likely to have prior malpractice claims (odds ratio 2.74) after controlling for content. That finding is an association, and it doesn’t show that tone caused the claims.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 22.6 percent of workers teleworked in March 2026. Those figures measure telework, not voice-only communication, though it’s reasonable to infer that many workplace conversations may happen outside a shared room.

With remote teams, where visual cues and body language are minimized, paraverbal communication can become even more important. Distance can make it harder to read the mood behind a message, which is one reason conflict in remote teams can build quietly.

Paraverbal Communication in Conflict and De-Escalation

Stress can change how people sound, and voices can rise, speed up, or turn clipped without anyone intending it. The other person may then respond to that delivery rather than the content. Paraverbal communication can help lower the temperature before you’ve found the right words.

CISA’s de-escalation guidance, from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, addresses tone, volume, rate of speech, and inflection. It notes that a slower rate “can be more soothing” and presents its tactics as voluntary options for potentially violent situations. Applying the same cues to everyday workplace conflict is a reasonable extension of that advice, though it goes beyond CISA’s stated scope.

In everyday workplace conflict, matching someone’s rising volume can push a conversation further off course. A lower, slower voice can set a calmer pace, and you might say, “I can hear this has been really frustrating. Let’s slow down so I understand what’s going on.” When people feel heard, the conversation has room to move beyond positions and reactions toward the needs and interests beneath the surface.

If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures, because de-escalation supports safety but never replaces safety protocols. You can find more ways to respond in the moment in this guide to de-escalation skills at work.

How to Improve Your Paraverbal Communication

Vocal habits can change with attention and practice. Start by recording yourself rehearsing a meeting update, then listen for pace, volume, and the words you stress. A trusted colleague can also tell you how you tend to sound under pressure.

Paying attention to other people’s paraverbal communication can help too. Active listening skills can help you notice tone as well as words.

The American Psychological Association summarized Michael Kraus’s listening-only emotion study, which ran five experiments. On average, people who only listened identified others’ emotions more accurately than people who watched or did both. In a 2018 reanalysis of the Kraus data published in American Psychologist, Rossiter argues that the voice-only advantage is too small to matter in practice.

Regulating yourself before you speak can also help. Taking one slow breath and lowering your pace can keep your voice steadier. Building emotional intelligence at work can help you recognize stress before it shows up in your voice.

When you’re unsure what someone’s tone means, check your interpretation out loud. You might say, “I might be reading your tone wrong, but it sounded like this deadline is stressful. Is that right?” This gives the other person a chance to clarify before a small misreading becomes a larger source of frustration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Building Paraverbal Skills Across Your Team

Paraverbal communication skills develop through practice, and teams can build them by rehearsing real conversations together. Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers customizable communication skills training for employees, managers, and leaders. These training sessions often incorporate role-play scenarios that mimic real-life challenges, providing a safe space for professionals to refine their communication skills. Schedule a free consultation to talk through your team’s goals.

Home > Blog > Empathetic Listening: Meaning, Importance, and Examples at Work

Many conversations at work end with someone feeling only partly heard. Even strong teams can fall into listening to reply, especially when deadlines are tight and opinions differ. Empathetic listening offers another habit, one that attends to emotions and perspectives as well as words.

What Is Empathetic Listening?

Empathetic listening is the ability to really understand a speaker’s message, both in the context of words spoken and the full spectrum of emotions behind them. It means taking in what someone says and how they feel about it, without rushing to judge or respond. Beyond Intractability, a University of Colorado conflict resource, describes empathic listening in mediation as listening and responding in ways that improve mutual understanding and trust.

In practice, an empathetic listener pays attention to the emotions and perspectives beneath the surface of a conversation. A complaint about a missed deadline may carry worry about workload, fairness, or how a manager sees someone’s work. Listening for that layer can help people feel understood before anyone moves to problem-solving.

Some practitioners draw a subtle distinction between empathic and empathetic listening, though many sources use the terms interchangeably. Empathic listening centers on actively sharing the speaker’s feelings, so the listener responds with shared emotion as well as understanding. Empathetic listening stays highly attentive while keeping a bit of emotional distance, which leaves room for solution-focused dialogue.

Empathetic listening also builds on active listening techniques at work. Active listening confirms the content of a message through paraphrasing and clarifying questions. Empathetic listening adds the emotional layer, so the speaker knows their feelings registered along with their facts.

The Importance of Empathetic Listening at Work

Trust is built when individuals feel heard and understood. Research on workplace listening supports the importance of empathetic listening, although most studies measure associations.

Kluger and Itzchakov’s 2022 review on the power of listening at work calls listening “associated with and a likely cause of desired organizational outcomes.” Their Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior article names job performance, leadership, relationship quality such as trust, and well-being.

A 2023 meta-analysis of workplace listening by Kluger and colleagues covered 122 papers. The Journal of Business and Psychology analysis found that perceived listening was associated with work outcomes at an average correlation of 0.39.

Kluger and colleagues reported 0.51 for relationship outcomes and 0.36 for performance, or 0.21 when only effects drawn from different sources or methods were counted. Most of the studies were correlational.

In 2021, The Workforce Institute at UKG, an HR software company, ran a global survey on feeling heard of workers in 11 countries. In that UKG survey, 63% of employees said their voice had been ignored by their manager or employer. The same UKG survey found that 34% said they would rather quit or switch teams than voice their true concerns.

Catalyst’s 2021 research on empathic leaders surveyed nearly 900 US employees. In the Catalyst survey, 76% of employees with highly empathic senior leaders reported being engaged, compared with 32% of those with less empathic leaders. Catalyst defined empathy as care for employees’ life circumstances, so the finding reflects empathic leadership broadly.

Listening can also shape whether concerns surface while they’re still small. People who expect to be heard may raise worries early, a willingness central to genuine psychological safety at work.

Core Principles of Empathetic Listening

Three principles shape empathetic listening in practice. Presence, validation, and genuine curiosity each help a listener hear what sits beneath a person’s words.

Presence

Being fully present is the first principle of empathetic listening. This means setting aside distractions and focusing wholly on the speaker, providing them with the full attention they deserve. In a workplace conversation, that can mean closing a laptop, silencing notifications, and facing the person.

Presence also includes attending to body language and tone of voice. Emotional intelligence helps a listener notice nonverbal cues, such as a tight voice or a long pause, that may say more than words.

Validation

Validation in empathic listening involves acknowledging and accepting the speaker’s feelings and perspectives as legitimate. Validating a feeling differs from agreeing with someone’s version of events. A manager can accept that an employee feels frustrated by a schedule change while still keeping the change in place.

A validating response might sound like, “It makes sense that you’d feel frustrated, given how much time you put into the original plan.” That kind of acknowledgment can lower defensiveness, which may make it easier for the person to keep talking.

Genuine Curiosity

Approaching conversations with genuine curiosity invites a deeper level of discourse and shows that you are interested not just in the response but in the person behind the words. Open questions like “What matters most to you here?” can move a conversation beyond positions and reactions toward the interests and needs underneath.

Strong reactions at work may signal that a person feels one of their six core psychological needs is under threat. The SAPIEN model names them as safety, affiliation, positive self-concept, independence, engaging activities, and noble pursuits.

Someone who pushes back hard on a reassignment may be responding to a perceived threat to independence or positive self-concept. A curious question gives them space to say so.

How to Practice Empathetic Listening in a Conversation

Empathetic listening in a live conversation can follow a simple sequence. Each step builds on the one before it, moving from understanding toward support. The sequence can be especially useful in difficult workplace conversations.

1. Reflect the content and the emotion with a line like “So the deadline moved up, and you’re feeling stretched thin.”
2. Name the feeling tentatively, as in “It sounds like this has been discouraging,” so the person can correct you.
3. Ask one open question, such as “What’s been the hardest part?” and give the person time to answer.
4. Hold advice until the person feels understood, then ask “What would help most right now?” before offering ideas.

Empathetic listeners mirror the emotions and content shared by the speaker, reflecting understanding and acknowledgment. A reflective response interprets the meaning behind what was said, which goes further than repeating words back. It shows that a concern registered and gives the speaker a chance to clarify.

Examples of Empathetic Listening in the Workplace

The two scenarios below show how empathetic listening can sound at work, along with replies that could close the conversation down.

A colleague seems unusually quiet during meetings and has stopped contributing ideas. You approach them privately and ask if they would like to talk. They express feeling overwhelmed by a high workload and fear that they’re falling behind.

An empathetic response acknowledges the concern without judgment, such as “It sounds like the workload has been heavy, and you’re worried about falling behind.” A reply like “Everyone’s stretched right now” may be meant kindly, but it can leave the person feeling dismissed.

Once they feel heard, the conversation can turn to prioritizing tasks. A check-in a week later gives them another chance to share how things are going.

An employee appears upset after receiving critical feedback in a group setting. You approach them after the meeting and ask if they’d like to discuss it in private. They reveal feeling discouraged and embarrassed.

A supportive reply validates how hard public feedback can be, such as “Getting that feedback in front of the whole team sounds really uncomfortable.” A reply like “Don’t take it personally” can suggest that their reaction is the issue. Once the employee feels understood, a manager can offer guidance on the feedback in a later conversation.

Common Barriers to Empathetic Listening

Barriers to empathetic listening are a natural part of working under stress. Even skilled listeners can lose focus when a meeting runs long or a conversation touches on something personal.

Distractions can come from outside or inside the listener. External distractions might include environmental noise or interruptions, while internal distractions encompass wandering thoughts or preoccupation with how we are going to respond when we have a turn to speak. A quiet space and silenced devices can help reduce both kinds.

Our preconceived notions and biases about others can cloud our judgment and listening. These may come from past experiences or assumptions about a role or group. A learner’s mindset, which treats each conversation as a chance to learn about the other person, can help a listener hear what’s actually said.

Emotional reactivity can also get in the way, especially around criticism. Feeling defensive or upset may keep someone from fully taking in the message. Pausing for a slow breath before responding can create space to choose a reply, and emotional intelligence in workplace conflict can support that self-awareness.

Building Empathetic Listening Skills Across Your Team

Empathetic listening is a learnable skill. Like other communication skills, it can develop through regular practice and feedback.

Leaders can model it in one-on-ones by reflecting what they hear and asking an open question before offering advice. When managers listen this way consistently, employees can see what the skill looks like in real conversations.

Teams can also practice together. Short role-plays based on realistic workplace situations give people a low-stakes way to try reflective responses. A reflective summary at the end of a meeting, where someone restates key points and concerns, can help check shared understanding.

Some teams agree to a brief pause before anyone replies during heated discussions. That pause gives people a moment to take in what they heard and notice their own reactions before they respond.

Support for Your Team’s Communication Skills

Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers communication skills training that covers empathetic listening, active listening, and perspective-taking. PPS training gives employees and leaders practical skills for hearing the needs, interests, and emotions beneath the surface. Schedule a Free Consultation to talk through what your team needs.

Home > Blog > Customer Service Challenges: The Hardest Customer Interactions and How Teams Can Handle Them

Every customer-facing team handles a steady mix of routine requests and harder moments. The customer service challenges that weigh most on staff tend to be human ones, such as a customer who is very upset. Even strong, well-trained teams meet these moments regularly, and they can be prepared for.

For managers, HR leaders, and executives, this work happens on two levels. One is equipping frontline staff with words and habits for hard conversations. The other is supporting those same people once a hard conversation ends.

What Are the Most Common Customer Service Challenges?

The most common customer service challenges are customers who are angry, outages and ticket surges, requests staff can’t grant, unanswered questions, and occasional abusive behavior. Each one involves a gap between what a customer needs and what the team can offer in that moment. Conflict like this is a normal part of service work, and staff can learn to respond to it with skill.

Many customer interactions go smoothly. When things do not go well, however, it is the customer service team that has to hear about it. Recent survey data suggests those moments are common.

Arizona State University’s W. P. Carey School of Business conducted the 2025 National Customer Rage Survey with Customer Care Measurement & Consulting. In the ASU self-reported survey of 1,000 U.S. adults, 77% said they had a product or service problem in the past 12 months. Of those respondents, 64% felt rage and 50% raised their voice, a record for the ASU survey.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projections show about 289,500 openings a year for customer service representatives, on average, over the 2025–35 decade. The BLS projects that employment in the occupation will decline about 5% over the same period. According to the BLS, those openings are expected to come from replacing workers who transfer to other occupations or leave the labor force.

Leaders looking for a starting point on common triggers can review these practical tips for difficult customers.

Angry Customers Who Take Their Frustration Out on Staff

Venting can be a sign that a customer feels unheard. A customer who is very upset may need to know someone understands the problem before they can take in a solution. The staff member on the line is often not the cause of that frustration, which can make these calls draining.

One practical approach, the HEARD method, gives staff a simple sequence to follow, which stands for Hear, Empathize, Apologize, Resolve, and Diagnose. Many teams find the first two steps carry the most weight.

In other words, first, hear the customer out. Let her describe the problem from beginning to end, and don’t interrupt. Then acknowledge the customer’s frustration and signal your willingness to help.

Staff might say, “I can hear how frustrating this has been. Let me make sure I have the whole picture.” Once the customer has finished, a phrase such as “I’m sorry this happened, and I want to help sort it out” can open the way to next steps.

Offering a solution too early can feel dismissive, even when the solution is right. Blame can make things worse. Angry customers do not get any less angry when you tell them point-blank that they caused their own problems or that any reasonable person could have avoided the problem.

Charm is as important a job skill for customer service agents as technical know-how. Managers can reinforce this by coaching tone and listening alongside product knowledge. Teams that want more phone-specific guidance can explore these call center de-escalation techniques.

Outages and Ticket Surges: Delivering the Same Bad News at Volume

Outages and ticket surges are among the most predictable customer service challenges, yet they still put staff in a hard position. Many customers are affected at once, and the team may have no solution to offer yet. It is still your job to provide customer support, even when you cannot immediately solve the problem.

In situations like these, you can predict the customer’s issue with near-perfect accuracy before you even pick up the phone. That predictability gives teams a chance to prepare. Keeping communication open means sharing what is known, what isn’t known yet, and when the next update will come.

Staff might say, “Our team is working on the outage right now. I don’t have a restore time yet, and we’ll share an update within the hour.” A consistent message across the team can help customers trust what they hear.

Once volume peaks, a recorded message from the crisis communication plan can carry the repeated update. It can be exhausting for humans to repeat the same disappointing news to hundreds of customers in rapid succession, but recorded messages are in their element when doing exactly that.

Taking every customer’s complaint seriously is good for business, but it is time-consuming. Teams can sort tickets into quick requests and complex cases. Splitting the work lets quick requests move fast while experienced staff take the complex ones.

Managers can also rotate staff off the highest-volume queues for short stretches. Delivering the same disappointing news for hours can be a significant source of stress, and a change of task gives people room to reset.

Requests Staff Can’t Grant, Such as Discounts or Exceptions

Some requests fall outside what frontline staff are allowed to offer. If your company charges the same prices to everyone and rarely offers promotional discounts, then “no” is the right answer. How staff say no can shape the rest of the conversation.

Phrases such as “I don’t make the rules” may feel honest, yet they can leave the customer feeling dismissed. A more collaborative approach explains the reason behind the policy and then moves to what staff can do.

A request for a discount can reflect an underlying interest, such as saving money or being treated fairly. Asking about that need can surface options the original request didn’t.

Staff might say, “We keep pricing the same for every customer so it stays fair. I can’t apply a discount, but I can show you a plan that may lower your monthly cost.”

That alternative has to be real. Managers can define in advance what frontline staff may offer, such as plan changes or service credits, so staff aren’t improvising under pressure. These customer service conflict examples show how similar conversations can unfold.

Questions Nobody Has the Answer To Yet

Customers can take “I don’t know” personally, especially after a long wait. It isn’t your job to be omniscient, but it is your job to find out the answers to questions that are outside of your knowledge base.

A useful first step is checking the customer’s history for earlier contacts or notes. You may need to refer a customer to a coworker who is in a better position to solve the problem. A warm handoff, where staff brief the colleague so the customer doesn’t have to repeat the story, can help preserve trust.

Staff might say, “I don’t want to guess on this. Let me bring in our billing specialist, and I’ll stay on the line while I do.”

Leaders can support these moments by building clear escalation paths, so staff know who owns which questions. Good customer service etiquette also includes setting honest expectations about follow-up.

When a Customer Becomes Abusive

Some interactions cross a line from frustration into abuse, such as threats, slurs, or sustained personal insults. These moments can weigh heavily on the staff who experience them.

In retail settings, NIOSH guidance on retail violence identifies customer-perpetrated violence, including threats or verbal abuse, as the most common type. In the same retail guidance, NIOSH also links workplace violence with burnout and psychological distress.

Whatever you do, don’t respond to customers by fighting fire with fire. Matching a customer’s intensity can escalate the conversation. A calm, direct boundary gives the customer a clear choice about how the conversation continues.

Leaders can set a clear, consistent standard for when staff may end an interaction, and then back the staff who follow it. Staff might say, “I want to help with this, and I can’t continue if the language continues.” If it does continue, they can close respectfully by saying, “I’m going to end the call now, and you’re welcome to contact us again.”

If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures; de-escalation supports safety but never replaces safety protocols. In rare cases, ending the business relationship may be in the team’s best interest, and that decision calls for tact and clear documentation.

How Leaders Can Support Teams After Difficult Interactions

Hard interactions can stay with staff after the call ends. A meta-analysis of 119 studies in the Journal of Service Management linked customer mistreatment with negative emotions and higher turnover intention. The same Journal of Service Management analysis also linked mistreatment with lower job satisfaction, commitment, and engagement.

Turnover intention measures plans to leave, so the findings point to risk and do not count departures. Leaders can respond with a few practical habits.

• A short reset after a hard call, even a few minutes away from the queue, can give strong emotions time to settle.
• A brief debrief with a supervisor lets staff talk through what happened and what they might try next time.
• Specific recognition, such as naming how someone stayed calm with a customer who was very upset, shows that the skill is valued.
• Regular role-play lets teams practice the customer service challenges in this article before they meet them on a live call.

These habits can work alongside broader efforts toward preventing burnout at work, such as reasonable workloads and predictable schedules.

Building Conflict Skills on Customer-Facing Teams

Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers de-escalation training for customer service teams. The training gives staff practical skills for listening beneath the surface, responding to strong emotions, and setting respectful boundaries. PPS can tailor it to the customer service challenges your team meets most often, and a free consultation is a simple first step.

Schedule a Free Consultation

Home > Blog > Customer Service Games for Employees: 7 Training Games That Build Real Skills

Why Customer Service Games Work for Employee Training

Customer service games for employees are short, structured role-plays and exercises that let staff practice listening, empathy, clear handoffs, and de-escalation in a low-stakes setting. They give teams a chance to rehearse those skills before they need them with a real customer.

Customer service representatives don’t get nearly enough credit for the intellectual dexterity and emotional intelligence that their jobs require. Frontline work can be demanding, even for experienced and well-supported teams. In a 2022 global survey of frontline employees by Georgetown’s Christine Porath, reported by Fortune, about 76% said they faced incivility at least monthly.

Responses were self-reported, and the sample included people who observed frontline workers. Service moments also carry business weight. Self-reported consumer research on poor experiences from Qualtrics XM Institute estimates consumers cut spending after 38% of very poor experiences and stopped after another 15%.

Customer service skills, like most interpersonal skills, can be learned. How helpful you are to customers is about more than just having a naturally extroverted personality. Customer service training games give employees repeated, low-pressure practice, and they tend to work best alongside instruction and a structured debrief.

Improv Games: World’s Worst and the Multi-Scene Challenge

World’s Worst

World’s Worst is a popular improv comedy game. In this game, the players take turns coming up with one-liners that represent the world’s worst tour guide, roommate, barber, first date, or whatever the category happens to be for this particular round of the game.

For a service team, a round-robin of “world’s worst customer requests” makes an easy icebreaker. Swapping the most outlandish requests people have received can build camaraderie.

To make this exercise better serve the purpose of customer service training, though, you should instead introduce an element in which one participant plays the role of an unflappable employee who gracefully fields all of the complaints and provides excellent customer service. That player might answer an impossible request with “I can’t do that today, but I can set up the next best option right now.”

A reverse variation casts one player as the world’s worst agent and another as a long-suffering customer. Seeing unhelpful service from the customer’s side can show how quickly frustration builds.

The Multi-Scene Challenge

The Multi-Scene Challenge takes more preparation and offers richer practice. Small teams each script a difficult, multi-person scenario drawn from their own workplace, whether that’s a restaurant, an office, a hotel, or a help desk. One volunteer plays the employee in each scene and works through it live.

Two employees might have given a customer contradictory answers, and the volunteer has to sort out the right one. A group of loyal customers might want to cancel their subscriptions, or two customers might have booked the same space at the same time.

Rotate the employee role for every scene so more people practice under pressure. Encourage phrases that include everyone, such as “I want each of you to leave with a clear answer, so let’s go one at a time.”

Telephone: A Communication Game for Customer Handoffs

Telephone makes a simple point about handoffs. To play Telephone, the first person whispers a brief message in the ear of the second person, who whispers it in the ear of the third person, and so on, until all of the players have heard the message. The last player says the message aloud, and it’s usually far from the original.

That distortion is the lesson. When customers call a call center, they often get transferred to multiple employees, and one party has to explain the situation to another based on what he or she has heard from someone else. Each retelling can drop a detail or add an assumption, which may leave the customer repeating their story.

Playing Telephone shows how easily information shifts. It also sends the message that customer service teams should keep detailed written records and that each coworker should review the notes about the case before getting involved. For a call center version, whisper a realistic case summary, then compare the result with a written note passed down the same line.

Role-Play Games for Each Step of the HEARD Method

Role-play games work well when each one targets a single step of a de-escalation sequence. HEARD stands for Hear, Empathize, Apologize, Resolve, and Diagnose, though several variations of the acronym exist.

A guide to applying the HEARD method covers each step in more depth. Building one game per step gives every skill focused practice before employees combine them.

Hear: The Repeat-Back Game

The Hear step asks employees to listen fully and then restate the customer’s problem in their own words. A road-trip memory game adapts well here. In the original, each player repeats a growing list of items and adds one more.

In the customer service training version of this game, one participant can play a customer, and another can play an employee. Each time the customer adds a detail, the employee restates the whole problem, as in this short exchange.

• Customer: “I returned a meat thermometer, but I didn’t receive a refund.”
• Employee: “You haven’t received a refund for the meat thermometer you bought from us.”
• Customer: “I returned it a week ago.”
• Employee: “You bought a meat thermometer from us, and you returned it a week ago, but you haven’t received a refund.”

The restatement grows with every line. For a harder round, give the customer three minutes to describe the problem as confusingly as possible, changing details along the way. In another variation, the first employee briefs a colleague in another department, who must restate the problem accurately before taking over.

Empathize: The First World Problems Game

Empathy can be hard to sustain across a full day of complaints, especially when many seem small or avoidable. In the First World Problems game, one participant plays an employee and four others play customers. Each customer brings a complaint that’s trivial, self-caused, or both, and the employee has one minute to respond.

The goal is an empathetic response that doesn’t imply the customer should have known better. Players aim for real perspective-taking, with phrases such as “That’s frustrating when you’re already short on time, so let’s sort it out together.”

A 2011 meta-analysis of emotional labor by Hülsheger and Schewe found faking feelings, called surface acting, was associated with impaired well-being. The same study found deep acting, genuinely working to feel what a situation calls for, was associated with stronger emotional performance and customer satisfaction.

Players can also look for the need beneath the surface of each complaint. A guide to the core psychological needs behind conflict describes six needs in the SAPIEN model, including safety, which covers stability and predictability. A customer upset over a late delivery may be expressing a need for predictability, and naming that interest can help the conversation settle.

Resolve and Diagnose: Puzzle and Pattern Games

The Resolve step comes fourth in HEARD, and puzzle games give teams a way to practice collaborative problem-solving. Distribute pieces from several jigsaw puzzles among players, then allow only one-to-one conversations. Players have to describe their pieces precisely, such as “mostly red and black with fine, intersecting lines,” to find who holds the matching ones.

Even playing a pre-existing strategy game like Mastermind requires employees to solve problems while keeping track of details, working within constraints, and collaborating. That combination mirrors a complex customer case with several moving parts.

Diagnose, the final step, means spotting the underlying problem so it’s less likely to recur. You can reinforce this skill through games by having employees recognize patterns in charts and reports. Hand out printed charts, ask teams to find the recurring issue, and give them a time limit to change one variable and predict the effect.

How to Run and Debrief Customer Service Training Games

The debrief is where much of a game’s learning can surface. Choose games based on the skill gap you see, such as Telephone for handoff errors or First World Problems for empathy under pressure. Keep each round short, and frame feedback around the skill rather than the person, so employees can feel more comfortable trying new phrases.

After each round, a few consistent questions can connect the game to real work.

• What worked in that conversation, and what would you keep?
• What might the customer have needed beneath the complaint?
• How would this apply to a real call or counter conversation this week?

Close by asking each person to name one behavior to try on their next shift, such as restating a problem before offering a solution. Each game can also run over video. For more ideas that build listening between colleagues, explore these team communication and empathy activities.

De-Escalation Is Not a Game

Games can help build habits, but they don’t replace de-escalation training or safety protocols. Some customer interactions carry real risk. Bureau of Justice Statistics federal workplace violence data shows customers or clients committed about 7% of nonfatal violent workplace crimes between 2015 and 2019.

The same Bureau of Justice Statistics report found retail workers experienced 17% of private-sector nonfatal workplace violence, nearly double their 9% share of that workforce. These figures measure crime rather than everyday rudeness. If there is an immediate threat of violence or serious harm, follow your organization’s emergency procedures; de-escalation supports safety but never replaces safety protocols.

For tense conversations below that threshold, employees can learn to recognize the emotions and needs beneath a customer’s words and respond calmly. Guidance on handling difficult customers calmly offers practical approaches for those moments. An overview of essential de-escalation skills goes deeper.

Frequently Asked Questions

Support for Your Customer Service Team

Pollack Peacebuilding Systems offers customer service de-escalation training that pairs role-play practice with active listening and empathy skills. The training is designed to help employees respond to the needs, interests, and emotions beneath difficult customer interactions. To explore options for your team, schedule a free consultation through the training page.